Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Connections certainly one of spouse identity trait similarity, matchmaking onset, matchmaking quality, and love. [ Hyperlinks ]
Baxter, L. An effective., & West, L. (2003). Few perceptions of their similarities and you may distinctions: A beneficial dialectical position. Record of Individual and Public Relationship, 20, 491-514. [ Website links ]
Berscheid, Age. (1985)patibility, interdependence, and you can emotion. From inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and in conflict relationship (pp. 143-161). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]
Berscheid, Age., Dion, K., Walster, E., & Walster, Grams. W. (1971). Actual attractiveness and you will relationships solutions: An examination of one’s complimentary hypothesis. Journal regarding Fresh Personal Psychology, 7, 173-189. [ Backlinks ]
Record out of Social and private Matchmaking, 24, 479-496
Berscheid, E., & Regan, P. (2005). New psychology of social relationship. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Studies (Prentice Hallway). [ Backlinks ]
Berger, C. R. (1975). Task results and you can attributional communication because the determinants regarding interpersonal attraction. Address Monographs, 40, 280-286. [ Links ]
Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and romantic relationships. Inside D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The fresh new manual off societal mindset (Vol. dos, fourth ed. Pp. 193-281). Nyc: McGraw-Slope. [ Links ]
Buckwalter, J. Grams., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, Letter. C. (2004, Can get 11). U.S. Patent six,735,568. Washington, DC. [ Website links ]
Buckwalter, J. Grams., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, Grams. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, Letter. C. (2008, Late. 18). You.S. Patent seven,454,357B2. Washington, DC. [ Backlinks ]
Buss, D. M. (1984). Marital variety having personality dispositions: Testing which have around three some other investigation supply. Behavior Genes, 14, 111-123. [ Website links ]
Byrne, D., & Rhamey, Roentgen. (1965). Magnitude from negative and positive reinforcements since the a beneficial determinant off interest. Record away from Identification and you can Social Psychology, dos, 884-889. [ Backlinks ]
Carter, S. Roentgen. (2005, Feb.), To have modern-date Cupids, data changes dating: Psychological technology is actually at the rear of brand new winning fits produced on eHarmony. Connection to have Emotional Science Observer, 18. Installed off [ Backlinks ]
Carter, S. Roentgen., & Buckwalter, J. G. (2009). Enhancing spouse options through the internet: An evaluation away from dating high quality ranging from marriage ceremonies due to an online dating system and you can marriage ceremonies as a result of unfettered alternatives. Interpersona: An international Journal into Private Relationship, 3, 105-125. [ Hyperlinks ]
Carter, S., & Snowfall, C. (2004, May). Enabling single people go into best marriage ceremonies playing with predictive types of marital success. Report displayed from the 16th Annual Summit of the Western Mental Community. [ Hyperlinks ]
Strategy and you will program getting determining people that are gonna possess a flourishing relationship
C). How come character amount within the ination regarding characteristic nervousness, negativity, and relationship pleasure. Diary off Identity and you can worldbrides.org prova den här webbplatsen Societal Mindset, 78, 326-336. [ Hyperlinks ]
Clark, Meters. S. (1985). Ramifications from relationships type getting information being compatible. Into the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you may in conflict relationship (pp. 119-140). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Coombs, Roentgen. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex variations in relationships ambition and you may fulfillment with pc-created lovers. Log out of ily, twenty-eight, 62-66. [ Backlinks ]
Cooper, Good., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Romance in cyberspace: Understanding on the web interest. Record of Sex Degree and you can Cures, 22, 7-fourteen. [ Website links ]
Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Manage individuals understand what they require: A comparable or complementary partner? Evolutionary Mindset, 6, 595-602. [ Links ]
Feingold, A great. (1988). Coordinating for appeal in the personal people and you will exact same-sex family: A beneficial meta-study and you can theoretical critique. Emotional Bulletin, 104, 226-235. [ Links ]
Felmlee, D. H. (2001). From appealing to appalling: Disenchantment with an intimate mate. Sociological Views, forty-two, 263-280. [ Links ]